Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Did you get a deal through TAXI? Lets hear about it!

Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff

sabalsounds
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2015 2:55 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by sabalsounds » Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:40 am

admin wrote:Yeah, it's another case of tech outpacing legislation, PROs, etc.
Michael
Truth!

16 years later and the entertainment industry is still reeling from the advent of Napster (why pay for it when you can get something for free or close to free?). Ironically (?) one of the co-founders of Napster is a Spotify board member that has the same approach to paying copyright owners (per Taylor Swift who just reached 5,000,000 in sales).
“The first draft reveals the art, revision reveals the artist” - Michael Lee

Taxi | Soundcloud

RockChild56
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 376
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Leeds, Utah
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by RockChild56 » Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:10 pm

stevebarden wrote:
Paulie wrote:Out of curiosity, what would it have paid if played on television that many times?

Paulie, for comparison, this 19-second cue on this episode played 4 times in prime time which paid $17, and played 3 times in the morning for $7.80.

If it paid at this same rate on the streaming sites I would be a rich man.

These ridiculous rates are similar with audio streaming services like Rhapsody and Spotify.
So 200,000 + people streamed the episode on Amazon correct?
So how many people (supposedly) would have seen those 3 morning episodes? 400,000 or so estimated? If you look at it that way it's about right (the math anyway).
I hope everyone here supports the "Songwriters Equity Act" before Congress at this time.
I think it has a lot to do with this exact dilemma.

I do agree Spotify, Pandora etc. are really killing the "Music Business/Industry".
I believe the way they base streaming is something along the lines of 1000 streams or whatever number they arrive at = 1 download or $0.99. Of that only 20% or so (I don't know exactly) goes to the writer.
Which is BS in the first place because I bet I have listened to Very Few Songs 1000 times If I ever have. But that is another subject.

Anyway Congrats on the placements and the Best Of Luck to us all in the Future. The way things are going We will need it.

EJB
E J Bell

jonnybutter
Committed Musician
Committed Musician
Posts: 834
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:37 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by jonnybutter » Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:08 pm

I do agree Spotify, Pandora etc. are really killing the "Music Business/Industry".
Apple at least is trying to make people pay, which is good (i.e. there is no advertiser sponsored/'free' version of Apple music). Don't know if that will be enough though.

Does anybody know how, say, Spotify, pays out vis a vis their 'free' service? When you hear of artists getting millions of streams and getting very little cash, does that include all of the free streams? Web advertising pays diddly these days, so does that account for it? Or is that just the paid streams? If the latter...hoo boy, what a bad deal.

sabalsounds
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2015 2:55 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by sabalsounds » Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:39 pm

Apple is poised to make Spotify and Pandora disappear entirely but then how will a monopoly help copyright owners? Unless of course you're Taylor Swift and call them out for bad business practices by publicly shaming them.

Life was so much easier when we had physical units to sell and payola at radio. :roll:
“The first draft reveals the art, revision reveals the artist” - Michael Lee

Taxi | Soundcloud

RockChild56
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 376
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Leeds, Utah
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by RockChild56 » Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:29 pm

Getting back to the original post. Remember the song usage is 19 second cue. It would not qualify as a
stream on most services or a play on Radio.
For Radio BMI calls a play 60 seconds or more. And they do not pay for the following on Radio.
*Cue, bridge or background music
*Partial performances of popular songs
*Station IDs or public service announcements
*Promotional announcements

As Michael pointed out in Television it probably has a lot to do with the Audience size.
As Russell said, Volume = $,$$$,$$$.$$. So 250,000 more like that and you'll have it made.

I found this and it helped me sort out some of it.
http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/ ... lties7.htm

Also, were you paid a Sync Fee? I think that would offset some of the sting of low
Performance Royalties.

It does make one wonder sometimes, WHY do we even do this.
LOL I guess it's like Leon Russel said about Drinking Booze.
Some of us has got to. And Willie Nelson replied, Else it won't get done.
E J Bell

User avatar
waltergrund
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:13 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by waltergrund » Fri Jul 10, 2015 2:37 am

Steve,

last year I ran an experiment with different streaming services to find out how much they really pay.
Spotify says 0.8 cent per stream. In reality it was a 0,1-0,001 cent. AND they just pay if your track gets played 30 sec + which is stated nowhere!!
I had over 3 Mio documented plays on rdio, but didn't see more than 19 USD.

Other streaming services did not pay at all.
One exception: XBox music did really well!!! BUT they shut down their free service.

So streaming is not worth it for musicians...although I use their service myself frequently.

Sad, but true
Walter

Axuel
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:34 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by Axuel » Fri Jul 10, 2015 5:21 am

Congrats, I think Michael made a good point about the royalties.

In my opinion a fair sync fee is important. When you really only get 5 dollars and no sync fee that would not be fair. But if you make let's say 500$+ sync fee plus a couple dollars royalties for background music thats a nice start in my opinion. When the publisher is not getting you any sync fee I would not provide them with any music. If they can get it for almost free and you support them with your music, you can't complain. When nobody would give them quality music for free they would start to pay again or go out of business.

Best Regards,
Axel

Kolstad
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 4620
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:19 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by Kolstad » Fri Jul 10, 2015 7:27 am

Can you collect streaming mechanicals from SoundExchenge for these type of shows in the US?
Ceo of my own life

SteveC
Committed Musician
Committed Musician
Posts: 540
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:49 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by SteveC » Fri Jul 10, 2015 9:55 am

Steve,

Congrats on the placement! $4.07? Up my way, that's a gallon of gas. No doubt the system needs revision. Plenty of noise on the subject but very little forward motion on the fix. All that considered, you still had a placement and that my friend, is WIN !! Continued success and lets get some zeros added to that check next time around.

RockChild56
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 376
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Leeds, Utah
Contact:

Re: Royalties, Royalties, and more Royalties

Post by RockChild56 » Fri Jul 10, 2015 12:54 pm

Kolstad wrote:Can you collect streaming mechanicals from SoundExchenge for these type of shows in the US?
I would say you are probably right. I think Steve should look into it.

Steve, You should check that out.
E J Bell

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests