Hit or Miss?

We're putting YOU in the drivers seat!

Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff

LamarPecorino
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by LamarPecorino » Wed Oct 16, 2019 6:43 pm

funsongs wrote:
Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:09 pm
FWIW: one of my first LPs was by The Challengers.
Agreeing with others about 'more reverb' on the solo/main guitar... while I personally would like the drums up, too;
I'd suggest doing an A/B comparison of your track to several other hit-maker surf bands of that mid-60s era.
The over-the-top reverb of that style, IMHO, will help it stand out as clearly more surf-guitar than Country Tele... and there are some similarities.

Great tune/work, Guys.
Thanks, Peter. We are working on refining it.
Onward and upward!
Lamar

“We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained" JFK

User avatar
lesmac
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:53 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Tasmania Australia
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by lesmac » Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:44 pm

I like the track and playing :D

I heard too much bass compared to some youtube playlists of 60's surf rock.
Try a 12dB/octave cut at 75Hz and a notch at around 350 with a Q narrowing the deeper you cut to taste and A/B against some references.

Maybe shave off some highs to imitate the effect that tape had on the high end back in the day.

My 2 cent salt shaker :lol:

johnlewitt
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1527
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:44 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by johnlewitt » Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:30 am

It's definitely spot on stylistically. It never hurts to tweak a mix to it's fullest, but I wasn't hearing anything way off in Mix #2.

LamarPecorino
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by LamarPecorino » Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:57 pm

lesmac wrote:
Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:44 pm
I like the track and playing :D

I heard too much bass compared to some youtube playlists of 60's surf rock.
Try a 12dB/octave cut at 75Hz and a notch at around 350 with a Q narrowing the deeper you cut to taste and A/B against some references.

Maybe shave off some highs to imitate the effect that tape had on the high end back in the day.

My 2 cent salt shaker :lol:
Thanks, Les. I'm uploading a revised version. I'll definitely consider your suggestions with the latest mix.
Onward and upward!
Lamar

“We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained" JFK

LamarPecorino
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by LamarPecorino » Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:03 pm

johnlewitt wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:30 am
It's definitely spot on stylistically. It never hurts to tweak a mix to it's fullest, but I wasn't hearing anything way off in Mix #2.
Thanks, John! They're always "works in progress" until I hit the submit button. ;)
Onward and upward!
Lamar

“We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained" JFK

LamarPecorino
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by LamarPecorino » Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:04 pm

Here is the latest version of Tidelands. Are we getting any closer?

Onward and upward!
Lamar

“We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained" JFK

User avatar
cassmcentee
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:40 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by cassmcentee » Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:00 pm

I vote for the 2nd version
Robert "Cass" McEntee
"Making music on a spinning ball of Magma"
https://soundcloud.com/robert-cass-mcentee
https://www.taxi.com/members/DosPalmasRecordings

LamarPecorino
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by LamarPecorino » Thu Oct 17, 2019 5:18 pm

cassmcentee wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:00 pm
I vote for the 2nd version
Thanks, Cass.
Onward and upward!
Lamar

“We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained" JFK

User avatar
lesmac
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:53 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Tasmania Australia
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by lesmac » Thu Oct 17, 2019 5:51 pm

Honest no BS opinion from me is that there is too much going on, I'd drop some instruments at times, take that 350Hz out of the drums and put some definition in the bass while reducing the boom.
Boomy (40 Hz – 90 Hz)
Fat (75 Hz – 150 Hz)
Thin (40 Hz – 180 Hz)
Power (40 Hz – 150 Hz)
Impact (40 Hz – 150 Hz)
Clarity (190 Hz – 800 Hz)
Presence (800 Hz – 6.5 kHz)
Attack (120 Hz – 4.1 kHz)
The drums are doing a lot so you don't need too much instrumentation. You have to sacrifice something- some organ/guitar or drums. I'd add a touch more reverb to the guitar. The guitar sounds compressed more than back in the day but that mightn't be a deal breaker.

I could be totally wrong :cry:

LamarPecorino
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Hit or Miss?

Post by LamarPecorino » Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:27 pm

lesmac wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 5:51 pm
Honest no BS opinion from me is that there is too much going on, I'd drop some instruments at times, take that 350Hz out of the drums and put some definition in the bass while reducing the boom.
Boomy (40 Hz – 90 Hz)
Fat (75 Hz – 150 Hz)
Thin (40 Hz – 180 Hz)
Power (40 Hz – 150 Hz)
Impact (40 Hz – 150 Hz)
Clarity (190 Hz – 800 Hz)
Presence (800 Hz – 6.5 kHz)
Attack (120 Hz – 4.1 kHz)
The drums are doing a lot so you don't need too much instrumentation. You have to sacrifice something- some organ/guitar or drums. I'd add a touch more reverb to the guitar. The guitar sounds compressed more than back in the day but that mightn't be a deal breaker.

I could be totally wrong :cry:
On the other hand, you could be totally right!! :) I see merit in both approaches. The early Surf records were fairly simple productions. So I like Mix 2 from that viewpoint. Mix 3 perhaps has too many moving parts. ;) I like some aspects of it. There are other aspects of which I am less enthusiastic. I'll keep tinkering with it. Who knows? I may end up submitting both. ;)
Onward and upward!
Lamar

“We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained" JFK

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: feaker66, hubert, macomposer and 10 guests