LUFS hell
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
- carel11
- Getting Busy
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
LUFS hell
I am working with a library who wants the finished project to have -11 LUFS
I have several stems I am mixing to create that.
No matter how use my compressor, limiter, or adaptive limiter, While the -11 is quite do-able, I cannot seem to get my true peak anywhere near -1. It's always in the red. around 2
When I get it the true peak to behave itself, I am at -13. Any suggestions or magic to bring then to the desired numbers?
thanks
carL
I have several stems I am mixing to create that.
No matter how use my compressor, limiter, or adaptive limiter, While the -11 is quite do-able, I cannot seem to get my true peak anywhere near -1. It's always in the red. around 2
When I get it the true peak to behave itself, I am at -13. Any suggestions or magic to bring then to the desired numbers?
thanks
carL
a little rock, a little roll, and a rather unfocused gaze
carl wurzbach
https://www.taxi.com/my/artist
https://soundcloud.com/carelw
http://carlwurzbach.com
carl wurzbach
https://www.taxi.com/my/artist
https://soundcloud.com/carelw
http://carlwurzbach.com
- eeoo
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:26 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: NorCal
- Contact:
Re: LUFS hell
Can't you just set your limiter to brickwall at -1? Maybe I'm not understanding (that's usually the case ).
- Telefunkin
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:37 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: LUFS hell
What's the difficulty with lifting the overall level to -11 with a true peak limit set to -1? If you're using Ozone for example you should be able to set that, but it sounds like you have a very dynamic mix, so is there a problem with distortion when you do that? If the peaks are distorting then I'd suggest going back into the mix and trying to controlling them a bit more using compression/limiting/clipping/envelope on the channels that are responsible (usually kick and/or snare). If you can control the peaks of the most dynamic elements with minimal sonic consequences then your whole mix should have more headroom, and that should help get the mastering range under control.
Graham (UK). Still composing a little faster than decomposing, and 100% HI.
- carel11
- Getting Busy
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: LUFS hell
Thanks for responding eeoo and tele.
I am not putting any plugins on the stereo out.
I have gone back to the original tracks (stems) and have started the arduous process of looking for all the peaks and overlapping frequencies and taming them with a ton of different plug ins to see which will work most efficiently . However to get the mix to sound right, I need the low percussion to sit at a level that keeps pushing the peak over.. when I bring it lower so as not to peak, I am at -14 LUFS. Every attempt winds up with me doing the low LUFS/PEAK overload dance. I am hoping someone have a different idea for a work through
thanks for the time and concern
carL
I am not putting any plugins on the stereo out.
I have gone back to the original tracks (stems) and have started the arduous process of looking for all the peaks and overlapping frequencies and taming them with a ton of different plug ins to see which will work most efficiently . However to get the mix to sound right, I need the low percussion to sit at a level that keeps pushing the peak over.. when I bring it lower so as not to peak, I am at -14 LUFS. Every attempt winds up with me doing the low LUFS/PEAK overload dance. I am hoping someone have a different idea for a work through
thanks for the time and concern
carL
a little rock, a little roll, and a rather unfocused gaze
carl wurzbach
https://www.taxi.com/my/artist
https://soundcloud.com/carelw
http://carlwurzbach.com
carl wurzbach
https://www.taxi.com/my/artist
https://soundcloud.com/carelw
http://carlwurzbach.com
- eeoo
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:26 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: NorCal
- Contact:
Re: LUFS hell
Is there a reason you're not using a limiter on your stereo out? I imagine pretty much all daws these days come with a pretty decent and transparent limiter.
- carel11
- Getting Busy
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: LUFS hell
Tell me if this thinking is wrong
when the stems are stacked on top of one other they create the stereo out. If I limit the stereo out, it will not be the sum of the stacks
thanks for the thought
carL
when the stems are stacked on top of one other they create the stereo out. If I limit the stereo out, it will not be the sum of the stacks
thanks for the thought
carL
a little rock, a little roll, and a rather unfocused gaze
carl wurzbach
https://www.taxi.com/my/artist
https://soundcloud.com/carelw
http://carlwurzbach.com
carl wurzbach
https://www.taxi.com/my/artist
https://soundcloud.com/carelw
http://carlwurzbach.com
- eeoo
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:26 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: NorCal
- Contact:
Re: LUFS hell
Do they want the stems as well as a main mix? I would assume if they want the stems separately they would do the mix/master. If they want a main mix i wouldn't hesitate to do some "mastering" on your output bus. Don't hesitate to reach out to them to clarify exactly what they expect.
- carel11
- Getting Busy
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: LUFS hell
thank you so much for the advice
i shall try going back
and reaching out
have a lovely night
carL
i shall try going back
and reaching out
have a lovely night
carL
a little rock, a little roll, and a rather unfocused gaze
carl wurzbach
https://www.taxi.com/my/artist
https://soundcloud.com/carelw
http://carlwurzbach.com
carl wurzbach
https://www.taxi.com/my/artist
https://soundcloud.com/carelw
http://carlwurzbach.com
- Telefunkin
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:37 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: LUFS hell
As said, it depends on exactly what they are asking for.
Most often its the main mix that libraries are concerned with but might request stems just in case someone wants to create slightly different mixes. You're right that any level-dependent processing on the master buss will affect the full mix differently than individual stems (or sub-mixes of them), but as long as you don't do anything drastic (and you shouldn't need to if the mix is good) then the difference is subtle and shouldn't get you any complaints. Because the library have specified what appear to be master level LUFS values I would assume that's what they want. If so, you could use a limiter on the master buss to get those levels for the main mix and leave it in place when rendering the stems.
However, some libraries prefer to create their own mastered version of the main mix from your stems. In that case its best to confine processing to the stems and not use anything on the master buss. Because they're in control of the final processing and levels you shouldn't have to worry about LUFS values for the combined stems other than leaving a bit of headroom for mastering (but I doubt that they'd ask for it as loud and as specific as the values you quote). Therefore, from what you've said it doesn't sound like this is what they really want.
As suggested, its important that you clear this up with the library. My guess (but that's all it can be until they confirm) is that you're in first situation where they want the main mix mastered to the specified LUFS values, but for you also to provide stems.
Most often its the main mix that libraries are concerned with but might request stems just in case someone wants to create slightly different mixes. You're right that any level-dependent processing on the master buss will affect the full mix differently than individual stems (or sub-mixes of them), but as long as you don't do anything drastic (and you shouldn't need to if the mix is good) then the difference is subtle and shouldn't get you any complaints. Because the library have specified what appear to be master level LUFS values I would assume that's what they want. If so, you could use a limiter on the master buss to get those levels for the main mix and leave it in place when rendering the stems.
However, some libraries prefer to create their own mastered version of the main mix from your stems. In that case its best to confine processing to the stems and not use anything on the master buss. Because they're in control of the final processing and levels you shouldn't have to worry about LUFS values for the combined stems other than leaving a bit of headroom for mastering (but I doubt that they'd ask for it as loud and as specific as the values you quote). Therefore, from what you've said it doesn't sound like this is what they really want.
As suggested, its important that you clear this up with the library. My guess (but that's all it can be until they confirm) is that you're in first situation where they want the main mix mastered to the specified LUFS values, but for you also to provide stems.
Graham (UK). Still composing a little faster than decomposing, and 100% HI.
- edmondredd
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 2:01 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: LUFS hell
That's a tough guess, not knowing what the genre is, and what the track sounds like.
I suppose you need to set your framework (the 3 most important pillars of your music) in a way that those 3 hit the desired LUFS.
And then the rest will follow. You will then adjust to taste, and be sure to hit the desired LUFS.
This is applicable to a certain genre of course, and might not apply in your situation.
I suppose you need to set your framework (the 3 most important pillars of your music) in a way that those 3 hit the desired LUFS.
And then the rest will follow. You will then adjust to taste, and be sure to hit the desired LUFS.
This is applicable to a certain genre of course, and might not apply in your situation.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests