Sampler software
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
-
- Impressive
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:25 am
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: Sampler software
And there's Chicken Systems Translator too, but I'd still rather start with a format that doesn't require conversion. Sample programming is pretty complicated these days.
-
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 3320
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 5:02 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Sampler software
Quote:Quote:you could arguably count Mach 5 and NNXT under "cockamamie" sampler formatsMach 5 can read a number of different sample formats. I put almost all of my Giga libraries into M5. I know some libraries have built in goodies, such as keyswitching (where you can play a key that's out of the instruments range and switch the samples across the board, say to switch from stac to leg) and I don't think that M5 supports that. It's easier for me to use M5 than GIGA because I can save my patches inside my project.but like matto said, it all depends on what your trying to do.ZinkPlease note that I didn't mean to imply that Mach 5 was not a good product, just that it's not as widely supported (natively) by third party developers as the other choices I mentioned. Which would be an important consideration to me if I were to buy my first full-blown soft sampler.I agree with Nick that you tend to lose functionality if you have to convert to a different format, particularly now with things like scripting in K2 (or i-midi in Giga). But of course none of this really matters if all you want to do is some fairly simple sampling and programming.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests