Returned - Not quite broadcast quality

Liked your review? Rave about it! Hated it, let us know!

Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff

Post Reply
Rickwnd
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:12 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Returned - Not quite broadcast quality

Post by Rickwnd » Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:00 pm

I just had a return for a Y Listing so critique was not provided. It did have a one liner for reason which was "Not quite broadcast quality, a little 'dark' in mood". I agree the mood is a little dark.
But the broadcast quality comment has me confused.

The track was submitted to

Y120113TV
Cable Network Music Supervisor needs a CONTEMPORARY, INSPIRING, HIGH ENERGY INDIE ROCK SONG **or** INSTRUMENTAL TRACK for the MAIN TITLE on a new Reality Show on a large cable network.

ALL submissions will be screened on a YES/NO BASIS by the Music Supervisor HERSELF

Listener ID # 326


I would appreciate it if I could get other people's opinion since I'm not hearing the problem in my headphones or monitors. Are my ears just getting old?

Song is "Work In Time"

http://www.taximusic.com/hosting/home.p ... davidmiles

User avatar
cardell
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 2815
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Returned - Not quite broadcast quality

Post by cardell » Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:16 pm

Rickwnd wrote:I just had a return for a Y Listing so critique was not provided. It did have a one liner for reason which was "Not quite broadcast quality, a little 'dark' in mood". I agree the mood is a little dark.
But the broadcast quality comment has me confused.

The track was submitted to

Y120113TV
Cable Network Music Supervisor needs a CONTEMPORARY, INSPIRING, HIGH ENERGY INDIE ROCK SONG **or** INSTRUMENTAL TRACK for the MAIN TITLE on a new Reality Show on a large cable network.

ALL submissions will be screened on a YES/NO BASIS by the Music Supervisor HERSELF

Listener ID # 326


I would appreciate it if I could get other people's opinion since I'm not hearing the problem in my headphones or monitors. Are my ears just getting old?

Song is "Work In Time"

http://www.taximusic.com/hosting/home.p ... davidmiles
Welcome David,

I actually agree with you! :)

I'd just high-pass-filter a few of your tracks and widen the mix a little, but it's quite good (as is) to my ears.

Stuart
Cardell Music
Image Image
“When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." - Jimi Hendrix

User avatar
burpo
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 7:50 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Returned - Not quite broadcast quality

Post by burpo » Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:47 pm

Nice track! Good vibe.

I'm certainly no expert, but if I were to point out
spots that could be strengthened, they would be these;

The groove seems to go in an out of the pocket.
The individual sonic elements seem a little thin,
preventing the track to feel cohesive. Some
compression and perhaps a smidge of chorus could
help thicken your stew.

Funny. I didn't find it that dark. It just had drive,
to my ears any way.

Good work!!
burpo
Stephen Debonrepos
"Flufferpuff" on TAXI TV
http://www.taxi.com/burpo

Long-time hobby musician

User avatar
sedge
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1293
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:40 am
Gender: Male
Location: Wallica & Gromit land, UK
Contact:

Re: Returned - Not quite broadcast quality

Post by sedge » Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:32 am

Hi David, I feel I can help here!
Rickwnd wrote:a little 'dark' in mood
is the reason the song was
Rickwnd wrote:Not quite broadcast quality
.. for that listing!

I have come to learn that the term "Broadcast Quality" does not always relate to production/mixing, and it can differ listing to listing and be many things like lyrics , structure, vibe etc too.

"Broadcast Quality" can be different for different listings , think of it as more of a general term, "quality enough to be broadcast on this project'

I hope I didn't confuse more! Hope others are be able to confirm too

I like the tune btw!
screened by the Music Supervisor HERSELF
No need to must a melon here

Sedge

User avatar
Casey H
King of the World
King of the World
Posts: 14695
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: Returned - Not quite broadcast quality

Post by Casey H » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:00 am

Hi
Can't comment on the BQ with these speakers here but I do think it's not upbeat, exciting, and energetic enough for THIS listing. I might not call it "dark" (or at least not very dark) but definitely not "inspiring" enough.

This was screened by the music sup herself, so she obviously didn't feel it was what she was looking for.

I mentioned on another thread how nice it was that this supervisor, who screened as #326, took the time to give us a comment as to why a track didn't work for her. You can't ask for much more that that!! 8-) A listen by the music sup herself and feedback. That's pretty awesome. :D

Don't sweat it. See how it fairs with other submissions, make BQ adjustments per P2P feedback if needed, etc.

;) Casey

Rickwnd
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:12 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Returned - Not quite broadcast quality

Post by Rickwnd » Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:40 am

All thanks for your comments and suggestions.

Stuart - I have not tried widening the mix yet. Might help.

Burpo - additional compression might work. I could also cut out the some of the triangle. I think it might be what made it feel out of pocket at times.

Sedge - Makes sense if Broadcast Quality also means not good enough for this production

Casey - I do appreciate that the listener left a comment. I was just thrown by the phrase "Broadcast Quality". I understand phrases like "Not Inspiring" or "Music" but have not had a return due to "Broadcast Quality". For me the difference is "Not Broadcast Quality" implies mix needs to be cleaned up.

Again. Thanks to all who have responded to this post.

- Dave

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 151 guests