Instrumentalist "House painters" vs. Songwriter "Artist painters"
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
-
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 4620
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:19 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: Instrumentalist "House painters" vs. Songwriter "Artist painters"
Very true that both instrumentalists and singer songwriters are artists in their own right, but I think that what ML stated rings true for the many in the forums who done both as DIY producers. With a song with vocals you have to compose BOTH an instrumental bed AND compose a coherent lyric (sometimes both to specs) plus all the work producing vocals. So from a DIY production standpoint, it IS easier to produce instrumental tracks, simply because it involves fewer tasks and you therefore can get from a-z faster.
Of course, the quantity of tasks involved doesnt make any one less or more an artist, but from experience I can certainly relate to what ML said that instrumental tracks are easier. Dean Krippaehne is actually also an accomplished songwriter, and have had songs in the Billboard top 10. Without putting words in anyones mouth, Im sure those songs took a bit more effort than some of the Dramedy cues, as they in addition involve lyric composing, lyric performance, vocal editing and mixing, which is pretty time consuming no matter from what angle you look at it.
To me there is no less artistry in house painting than in artist painting, so Im not really struck by that analogy. I think working with tv/film music really has demystified the abstract idea of "the artist" for me, and dis-assembled artistry into a set of real skills and tasks that make up what we call "art". That demystified understanding of art doesnt make it any less artistic to me, but it does make it a lot more practical, and comforting in the sense that art as a set of skills and tasks is something anyone can learn, do and enjoy. As Ken Robinson says, schools in the western world takes away the natural born creativity we enter this world with, so the last thing we need now is to go back to an understanding of art as an elitist idea, that very few can learn and enjoy. Deans books are really wonderful this way, to demystify the high brow myth of "art", and so is Taxi, imo.
So I think you are wrong if assuming there is any underlaying idea to diminish certain types of artists in the efforts that Taxi makes, on the contrary, the inclusive message that this is something anybody can do with less effort than you think, is emphasized again and again. This speaks counter to common assumptions that you need to be an "artist" in the elitist sense, in order to put your already aquired artist skills to use. That is what Ive seen in the 5years+ Ive been a member and in the forums, and I have appreciated every moment of that.
Of course, the quantity of tasks involved doesnt make any one less or more an artist, but from experience I can certainly relate to what ML said that instrumental tracks are easier. Dean Krippaehne is actually also an accomplished songwriter, and have had songs in the Billboard top 10. Without putting words in anyones mouth, Im sure those songs took a bit more effort than some of the Dramedy cues, as they in addition involve lyric composing, lyric performance, vocal editing and mixing, which is pretty time consuming no matter from what angle you look at it.
To me there is no less artistry in house painting than in artist painting, so Im not really struck by that analogy. I think working with tv/film music really has demystified the abstract idea of "the artist" for me, and dis-assembled artistry into a set of real skills and tasks that make up what we call "art". That demystified understanding of art doesnt make it any less artistic to me, but it does make it a lot more practical, and comforting in the sense that art as a set of skills and tasks is something anyone can learn, do and enjoy. As Ken Robinson says, schools in the western world takes away the natural born creativity we enter this world with, so the last thing we need now is to go back to an understanding of art as an elitist idea, that very few can learn and enjoy. Deans books are really wonderful this way, to demystify the high brow myth of "art", and so is Taxi, imo.
So I think you are wrong if assuming there is any underlaying idea to diminish certain types of artists in the efforts that Taxi makes, on the contrary, the inclusive message that this is something anybody can do with less effort than you think, is emphasized again and again. This speaks counter to common assumptions that you need to be an "artist" in the elitist sense, in order to put your already aquired artist skills to use. That is what Ive seen in the 5years+ Ive been a member and in the forums, and I have appreciated every moment of that.
Ceo of my own life
- mojobone
- King of the World
- Posts: 11837
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 4:20 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Up in Indiana, where the tall corn grows
- Contact:
Re: Instrumentalist "House painters" vs. Songwriter "Artist painters"
Not disagreeing with Hummingbird, here, but I like to reserve the 'oil vs acrylic' painting analogy for debates involving analog and digital audio.
- Telefunkin
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 2503
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:37 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: Instrumentalist "House painters" vs. Songwriter "Artist painters"
Len, what about painting an opera house?
Sorry, being silly but I couldn't resist.
Sorry, being silly but I couldn't resist.
Graham (UK). Still composing a little faster than decomposing, and 100% HI.
-
- Impressive
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:34 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: Instrumentalist "House painters" vs. Songwriter "Artist painters"
I didn't miss Michael's original point of his analogy. I just disagree with the comparison that instrumental writing is easier just because it doesn't involve writing lyrics.
There's examples even on this form of primarily singer-songwriters that have a hard time trying to write instrumental cues outside their singer-songwriter style. And even though Robin Frederick treats a song with lyrics that has the vocal stems removed having the potential to become an instrumental cue, that's still not the same thing as writing an orchestral piece, or jazz, or big band piece, etc.
Anyone can learn to contrive a Hip-Hop beat with a simple drum library and bass samples mixed in a DAW, or load up an atmospheric drone patch from one of their synths and add a bit of percussion and call it a tension cue, etc. That's not what I'm talking about, but indeed fits Michael's analogy well. But write me a contrapuntal piece using 17th century counterpoint like what Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven studied to fit a classical period film scene, and suddenly the instrumental composer vs. songwriter comparison just doesn't work.
There's examples even on this form of primarily singer-songwriters that have a hard time trying to write instrumental cues outside their singer-songwriter style. And even though Robin Frederick treats a song with lyrics that has the vocal stems removed having the potential to become an instrumental cue, that's still not the same thing as writing an orchestral piece, or jazz, or big band piece, etc.
Anyone can learn to contrive a Hip-Hop beat with a simple drum library and bass samples mixed in a DAW, or load up an atmospheric drone patch from one of their synths and add a bit of percussion and call it a tension cue, etc. That's not what I'm talking about, but indeed fits Michael's analogy well. But write me a contrapuntal piece using 17th century counterpoint like what Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven studied to fit a classical period film scene, and suddenly the instrumental composer vs. songwriter comparison just doesn't work.
Dave Ramey
http://www.taxi.com/waveheavy
http://www.taxi.com/waveheavy
-
- Total Pro
- Posts: 5351
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:13 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Peculiar, MO
- Contact:
Re: Instrumentalist "House painters" vs. Songwriter "Artist painters"
Oh, sorry, it was about painting, wasn't it? Most are probably stone or marble or petrified wood, and not needing painting??Telefunkin wrote:Len, what about painting an opera house?
Sorry, being silly but I couldn't resist.
- hummingbird
- Total Pro
- Posts: 7189
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:50 am
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Instrumentalist "House painters" vs. Songwriter "Artist painters"
+1 Dave
"As we are creative beings, our lives become our works of art." (Julia Cameron)
Shy Singer-Songwriter Blog
Vikki Flawith Music Website
Shy Singer-Songwriter Blog
Vikki Flawith Music Website
-
- Total Pro
- Posts: 5351
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:13 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Peculiar, MO
- Contact:
Re: Instrumentalist "House painters" vs. Songwriter "Artist painters"
Classical period film scene? Wasn't that before talkies?But write me a contrapuntal piece using 17th century counterpoint like what Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven studied to fit a classical period film scene, and suddenly the instrumental composer vs. songwriter comparison just doesn't work.
The greatest instrument is the human voice, to a human. A symphony is probably better compared to a choir than a singer-songwriter. But then if you don't like the singer-songwriter?
The ear is naturally tuned to the voice, singer-songwriter would be harder, if for no other reason than it's almost impossible to have a neutral opinion of a singer-songwriter or the lyrics. It's easier not to notice an instrumental and perhaps be lulled to sleep. If I don't know the singer-songwriter, the picture I might get of the person from the voice, do they sound young and beautiful or old, fat and ugly,lol! Violins look pretty much the same.
- mojobone
- King of the World
- Posts: 11837
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 4:20 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Up in Indiana, where the tall corn grows
- Contact:
Re: Instrumentalist "House painters" vs. Songwriter "Artist painters"
Let's not get hung up on the difference between 'easy' and 'easier', please. Wait for the corollary, that instrumental cues are simpler to produce than instrumental songs. Instantly catchy, timeless melodies aren't exactly thick on the ground, whether they're sung or swung. It's a fair point that writing simply is one of the hardest things to do, but the whole point of the exercise, which I hope no one has missed is that the techniques transfer.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests