Good info here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Production_music
Production Music 101.
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
-
DesireInspires
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:06 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Miami Beach
- Contact:
-
ochaim
- Committed Musician
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:17 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: Production Music 101.
good find, DI!
-
SubRivers
- Impressive
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: Production Music 101.
production music libraries own all of the copyrights of their music. Thus, it can be licensed without the composer's permission, as is necessary in licensing music from normal publishers. This is because virtually all music created for music libraries is done on a work for hire basis.
This part is error #500
This part is error #500
-
cosmicdolphin
- Serious Musician
- Posts: 4477
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 1:46 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: Production Music 101.
Anyone can edit the WikipediaSubRivers wrote:production music libraries own all of the copyrights of their music. Thus, it can be licensed without the composer's permission, as is necessary in licensing music from normal publishers. This is because virtually all music created for music libraries is done on a work for hire basis.
This part is error #500
Buy me coffee https://ko-fi.com/cosmicdolphin78382
-
ochaim
- Committed Musician
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:17 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: Production Music 101.
which part is wrong? the work for hire part?
-
SubRivers
- Impressive
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:51 pm
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: Production Music 101.
Both the wfh and the copyright part.ochaim wrote:which part is wrong? the work for hire part?
Not questioning that they both occur - just the "all" and "virtually all" bits.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests