YES!!
broadcast quality = mix + production + arrangement + vibe = it could sit in a playlist with the three refs and sound just like them with some fresh musical ideas so its not a copyright rip.
It doesn't refer to the mix itself. If the arrangement isn't happening the mix won't happen either - for this particular listing. It may be a great track for another use which is the case here.
All the clues are in the ref tracks. The kind of instruments. The style of parts. The kind of chords (meaning triads vs. extended and chord progression). The usual way of using every instrument (like the wah guitar has 16th note subdivisions).
IMO on this one:
1) fretless bass
2) overplaying - mainly on the fretless. The solos you can accept but if they are too heavy that is enough for DQ as well.
3) 80's sounding electric piano instead of more of a 70's Rhodes / less tines more distortion in sound - none of the refs have Rhodes featured anyways
4) too wide bandwidth on everything - high and low pass every thing that isn't bass or kick. The 70's sound isn't "muddy" as much as it is "bandwidth limited".
5) too much stereo - instead of more mono sources panned across the soundstage.
6) general smooth jazz vibe
You can obviously play and arrange - with another attempt I bet you could nail this.
The organ rocked as well, but it seemed too hot in the mix when it came in. The horns could be spread out, hard panned to create some separation. And play less complex... dare I say "dumb it down" musically. Keep it simple so that the music doesn't distract from potential dialogue. 
