YouTube percentage for session musicians?

A creative space for business discussions.

Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff

Post Reply
User avatar
CarlParadise
Getting Busy
Getting Busy
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: San Diego
Contact:

YouTube percentage for session musicians?

Post by CarlParadise » Sat Mar 12, 2022 6:29 pm

My question is about whether or not to pay a percentage of YouTube revenue to session musicians? And whether any of that is administered via PROs like BMI or ASCAP?

This is directly related to a recent "indie" song release on YouTube, where I own all the song rights (copyright & publishing) and own the masters of the audio and video. I am the only person who paid money to get this project done.

Most everyone involved with the song and video has been paid by me for the labor, understanding it's a Work for Hire. Two players I paid $1.00 each and am giving them each a small revenue share from YouTube and other sources (music stores & streaming services).

The lead singer was initially paid as a Work for Hire and we also agreed to share some revenue.

Here's the wrinkle:

The lead singer says that in the past when he posted videos on YouTube, there is a place for him to apportion 6% of YouTube net dollars per *player*. This is presumably regardless of the Work for Hire agreements.

(I know that major labels have different terms, but again this is an indie release on my own label.)

So I am unable to locate anything from searching online to back up this 6% stuff for indie music, and don't recall ever hearing this before.

Anyone know anything about this? He is asking me for PRO (BMI, ASCAP) for the players to enter into YouTube which makes no sense to me. However I am paying attention because he's had a few videos in the million views range and generally seems knowledgable.

I saw some other, older discussions here where the writer/producer did Work for Hire with each session player, and avoided percentages entirely.

thanks in advance
https://www.taxi.com/members/carlparadise

Logic Pro X
Nord Electro 6D 61 key
AKAI Mini keyboard
Yamaha keyboards
Fender PJ bass
Fender XII Alternate Reality 12 string electric
Many other guitars

User avatar
hummingbird
Total Pro
Total Pro
Posts: 7189
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:50 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: YouTube percentage for session musicians?

Post by hummingbird » Sun Mar 13, 2022 1:00 am

I found this on splitting revenue from a channel or an individual video - https://www.usestir.com/support-answers ... plits-work

However, a Work for Hire is a Work for Hire. That signed agreement says that the person who signed it agrees and affirms that they have been paid up front and in full and that nothing more is owed to them & that the master belongs to you free and clear. Essentially, they received the agreed upon amount before any money was earned, and that's it. You can certainly share things out of the goodness of your heart but imo that's a bit of a slippery slope, especially if you are going to be releasing music, playing it live, or pitching it for film/tv. IMO you need to be clear that they have been paid.

If you agreed to pay them a share of future earnings, then the percentage owed to them should be in the agreement and that is what you should be paying.


just my opinion on the matter.
H
"As we are creative beings, our lives become our works of art." (Julia Cameron)

Shy Singer-Songwriter Blog

Vikki Flawith Music Website

User avatar
Casey H
King of the World
King of the World
Posts: 14163
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: YouTube percentage for session musicians?

Post by Casey H » Sun Mar 13, 2022 5:35 am

hummingbird wrote:
Sun Mar 13, 2022 1:00 am
I found this on splitting revenue from a channel or an individual video - https://www.usestir.com/support-answers ... plits-work

However, a Work for Hire is a Work for Hire. That signed agreement says that the person who signed it agrees and affirms that they have been paid up front and in full and that nothing more is owed to them & that the master belongs to you free and clear. Essentially, they received the agreed upon amount before any money was earned, and that's it. You can certainly share things out of the goodness of your heart but imo that's a bit of a slippery slope, especially if you are going to be releasing music, playing it live, or pitching it for film/tv. IMO you need to be clear that they have been paid.

If you agreed to pay them a share of future earnings, then the percentage owed to them should be in the agreement and that is what you should be paying.


just my opinion on the matter.
H
I used to advise to offer this if you want and put any future percentages such as N% of future sync fees in a WFH agreement. However, someone I know had a song rejected by the critical library when they showed them a WFH agreement with that clause-- from the library's POV (and very reasonable) if you owe someone else money, it's not free and clear. So I never offer anything other than the once and done fee and caution against it. Not taking any chances that my being committed to someone else means my song is not truly free and clear.

User avatar
hummingbird
Total Pro
Total Pro
Posts: 7189
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:50 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: YouTube percentage for session musicians?

Post by hummingbird » Sun Mar 13, 2022 6:43 am

Good point Casey!! Thanks for that info :)
"As we are creative beings, our lives become our works of art." (Julia Cameron)

Shy Singer-Songwriter Blog

Vikki Flawith Music Website

User avatar
cosmicdolphin
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 4450
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 1:46 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: YouTube percentage for session musicians?

Post by cosmicdolphin » Sun Mar 13, 2022 6:54 am

Don't give a Library a reason to reject the track.

Complicated tangled deals with multiple parties will complicate things to the point they will probably pass.

Keep WFH as WFH. Go even splits on everything for genuine co-writes

User avatar
CarlParadise
Getting Busy
Getting Busy
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Re: YouTube percentage for session musicians?

Post by CarlParadise » Sun Mar 13, 2022 8:50 am

Thanks everyone for your wisdom and assistance!
https://www.taxi.com/members/carlparadise

Logic Pro X
Nord Electro 6D 61 key
AKAI Mini keyboard
Yamaha keyboards
Fender PJ bass
Fender XII Alternate Reality 12 string electric
Many other guitars

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests