Do you guys EQ as you track, or add later? I've just been making sure I get a good S/N ratio, then EQ and effects later.
Wondering if I'm hurting myself that way?
Appreciate any input (no pun intended

Thanks.
Steve
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
Thanks Andre!gitanosoy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:30 amWhen recording my acoustic guitar I go through an API channel strip which I have made a template settings one for nylon and another for steel string guitar. This EQ is stamped on the track as I record then later if need to adjust the sound more I will put an EQ before my reverb on the AUX channel.
Thanks for your time, Erikeandersonmusic wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 12:39 pmThe only thing you have to be careful with is that you can't "undo" any effects after it has been tracked. Eq isn't a bad idea, can save time in the mix, light compression is OK too. Some instruments you will want to eq a certain way almost every time, like a hihat doesn't need any low end, so it can save time and help build a proper mix if you just cut that out while tracking. But I wouldn't put any delay or reverb on while tracking, because again you can't take them off after. If you are tracking guitar and plan on putting a delay on the track, you can put delay on an aux, not a direct pedal, if that helps with how you play it and not record the delay effect just in case you want to make some adjustments or edits later.
Thanks Garrett, appreciate the post.garrettmiller wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:05 pmGood points above. I keep a mic setup for my nylon guitar and over time have figured out how far away to find the sweet spot when recording and record dry. Guitar > mic > preamp > ad converter. I have eq and compressor settings stored for strumming and finger picking and add those and reverb later. I’ve had to re-record parts several months after the initial recording to make edit points before and recording without eq /compression works best for me. My 2 cents.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests