Submitting Already Forwarded Cues to New Listing?
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 2:36 pm
I'm seeing new listings that some of my cues could work for - cues that have already been forwarded once. Is it wrong to submit a cue to another listing in hopes of getting deals quicker/more frequently? I don't want to mess up potential clients by doing the wrong thing, so hopefully you guys can set me straight on this.
I'm concerned that I'm supposed to consider my forwarded tracks "off-limits" to other listings since there's a possibility of a deal coming sometime in the next week/month/year(s). But that means I have to sit on these forwarded tracks, potentially forever, without knowing if a deal will ever come.
Part of me thinks that if I'm approached after Taxi forwards a cue, it would be bad form to have to tell a library owner that I already signed that track?
On the other hand, I'm in no position to watch listings go by that could raise my chances of getting a deal. In that line of thinking, unless a cue gets signed, it's open season for pitching it to other listings.
Is there a standard philosophy on this subject?
I'm concerned that I'm supposed to consider my forwarded tracks "off-limits" to other listings since there's a possibility of a deal coming sometime in the next week/month/year(s). But that means I have to sit on these forwarded tracks, potentially forever, without knowing if a deal will ever come.
Part of me thinks that if I'm approached after Taxi forwards a cue, it would be bad form to have to tell a library owner that I already signed that track?
On the other hand, I'm in no position to watch listings go by that could raise my chances of getting a deal. In that line of thinking, unless a cue gets signed, it's open season for pitching it to other listings.
Is there a standard philosophy on this subject?