Julflorianus wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 3:56 am
How "bad" is it to submit a song that has already been published on Spotify, e.g. via CD BABY, but WITHOUT using their PRO option? In other words - when such a song is already online - but with only a couple of clicks - why should a licence company be bothered about this while the original rights still remain untouched?
There are two key areas with CD Baby (and similar) releases that could come into play:
1) CD Baby PRO is basically making them your administrative publisher to collect on your behalf, so that is one obvious point.
2) When you sign up a song or album, there is a section about whether you want them to "monetize your music" (not sure if that is the exact wording), which is specifically giving options are monetizing your music on YouTube, Facebook, and a few other possibilities, including sync. This is essentially making them your publisher (not just administrative publisher) for the any uses you get in those categories, and it gives them exclusivity in some of them (e.g. YouTube). Obviously that one will also run awry of a sync publisher who might also be trying to get placements in any areas they might explicitly or implicitly cover.
So now let's consider a library situation. Maybe they place your song in an ad or something that gets played on YouTube (in addition to any other media), but now CD Baby is the exclusive publisher for the recordings you include in the "monetize my music" part of their distribution, so the video with that song in it gets claimed by CD Baby due to YouTube content ID and your having given them that permission. So the library has put work into getting you the ad placement, but now it is claimed on YouTube by CD Baby (on your behalf).
So, if you are pitching your tracks distributed to CD Baby for exclusive library consideration, make sure to not sign them up for either CD Baby PRO or any of the "monetize my music" parts.
I've also seen a number of listings lately that indicate the music cannot be distributed through CD Baby at all (i.e. even if not signing up for the two parts mentioned above). They don't state why they require this, but I can think of a few possibilities:
One that would be important for songs that could be pitched for artist cuts is that any songs that are released and distributed are considered to have had their first publication. Copyright law provides a compulsory mechanical license provision that says, once first publication has occurred, anyone can license your track for their recording as long as they agree to certain provisions that are set out in the law, one of which is paying a statutory mechanical license rate (currently 9.1 cents per song for recordings under 5 minutes, with a per-minute rate for longer recordings, though the rates will go up in 2023). Prior to first publication, though, an initial mechanical rate is negotiable. So, if the record company/artist really wants the song badly, the publisher may have some leverage to hold out for a higher mechanical royalty rate and/or some prepayment of mechanical royalties. In general, I would not think this would be a common thing for libraries to care about since they aren't typically pitching songs to recording artists, but rather are trying to place the recordings in their library.
One other thought is maybe they will release the recordings themselves, and want to do it on their own terms, including being the one to collect any money for the recording and publishing side of things. Maybe it would be a hassle for them to try to back out of the things that are more or less automatically set up when you release a song that way. For example, when CD Baby collects from one of the outlets, you get any money that would be paid directly to the record label. In some (but not all) cases, this may include the mechanical royalties (in other cases, this could come through the MLC in the USA or foreign mechanicals societies outside the USA -- the latter is what CD Baby Pro would mainly get you beyond what CD Baby collects on its own as the MLC only covers the USA). But, if the library has your publishing, then they would be the ones to get the mechanicals, and then they'd pay you the writer's share. Maybe they just see this sort of stuff as too much of a hassle to work out, especially if the numbers are small (like they are for most of us "Long Tail" artists).