Page 1 of 1
APRA AND AMCOS question
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:42 pm
by stevecollom
Does anyone know if, APRA and AMCOS are the same company. i have been submitting songs to some librarys with my pro as apra, should i put down apra/amcos ?
thanks
steve
Re: APRA AND AMCOS question
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:35 am
by cardell
I find this a little confusing too.
Stuart
Re: APRA AND AMCOS question
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:49 pm
by el
Hi there. I think the difference is that APRA is the Australian pro that collects and distributes performance royalties ( like BMI in the US ) and AMCOS collects and distributes mechanical royalties ( like the Harry Fox Agency in the US).
Check out the website for more info:
www.apra-amcos.com.au
Cheers
el
Re: APRA AND AMCOS question
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:03 am
by flyingtadpole
I missed this for various reasons*
APRA is the PRO. AMCOS is the mechanical rights. They're administered jointly but legally remain two companies.
Because I have public performances AND "real" cd's and tracks out in the world (that is, they're on CDBaby, iTunes, etc, have their barcodes, library deposits) I have membership of both APRA and AMCOS.
If I didn't have those CDs, but still had my work performed at a recognised paid public venue, or broadcast, I would have membership in APRA only.
If I and my works just lurked at home and simply sold records/tracks, I'd be a member of AMCOS but not of APRA (which was the case to begin with).
If I and my works lurked at home and just played on myspace, youtube, soundclick, neither would have or want me as a member.
HTH. BTW, APRA/AMCOS are NOT copyright registering/protection organisations. Australian law is that copyright appears immediately you create something. there is no formal registration needed or available!
*(due to the Garden Shed From Hell and the Ten Thousand Tumbling Trojans which together severely limited my forum reading...)