Dear Taxi... I love you but... (The "Recording" box on Y/N)
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:03 pm
Taxi
I love you and support you all the way
but...
I think you need to have your screeners apply more consistent and clear rules as to when the "Recording" box is checked for a Y/N return.
I just had a return with the dreaded "Recording" box checked. The track was stylistically off-target and should have been returned-- no argument there. But too many times now, I've had a piece critiqued with high marks for production and engineering only to be returned on a Y/N with "Recording" checked. This piece was not only forwarded a few weeks ago but signed by the client. It's had a number of other forwards. It may be a lot of things but not BQ is definitely not one of them.
Let me say I DO UNDERSTAND how tough these mini-critiques are for your team-- the idea of Y/N was just that and the more info you provide, the more arguments you'll get. You are caught between a rock and a hard place and I 'get' it. I don't want to stir up a hornet's nest.
If this hadn't happened to me a few times, I wouldn't mention it.
Is the "Recording" box supposed to be whether or not the production and engineering is BQ enough for the listing? Or is it supposed to catch other things? What instructions do the screeners get regarding this?
The reason I'm not posting a link to the track is I see this as a general issue, not related to just this one submission.
Thanks for listening,
Casey
I love you and support you all the way

I think you need to have your screeners apply more consistent and clear rules as to when the "Recording" box is checked for a Y/N return.
I just had a return with the dreaded "Recording" box checked. The track was stylistically off-target and should have been returned-- no argument there. But too many times now, I've had a piece critiqued with high marks for production and engineering only to be returned on a Y/N with "Recording" checked. This piece was not only forwarded a few weeks ago but signed by the client. It's had a number of other forwards. It may be a lot of things but not BQ is definitely not one of them.
Let me say I DO UNDERSTAND how tough these mini-critiques are for your team-- the idea of Y/N was just that and the more info you provide, the more arguments you'll get. You are caught between a rock and a hard place and I 'get' it. I don't want to stir up a hornet's nest.
If this hadn't happened to me a few times, I wouldn't mention it.
Is the "Recording" box supposed to be whether or not the production and engineering is BQ enough for the listing? Or is it supposed to catch other things? What instructions do the screeners get regarding this?
The reason I'm not posting a link to the track is I see this as a general issue, not related to just this one submission.
Thanks for listening,
