Confused about "Contemporary covers of Classics" listing
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:18 pm
I need some business-savy people for this one!
You may have read the listing asking for contemporary covers of classics. Some examples they gave were Filter's "Happy Together" cover, Taken By Trees' "Sweet Child O' Mine" cover, Devlin and Ed Sheeran's "All Along the Watchtower" cover, etc. Basically they don't want a "sound-alike" cover, but a modern, interesting cover.
I was excited about this listing and jumped into my studio immediately. A couple days later I re-read the listing, and I noticed something I must've skimmed over... here is the part I need help understanding. The listing says "You’d be wise to avoid covers of songs that would be unaffordable or nearly impossible to license like; The Rolling Stones, U2, The Beatles, Neil Young, etc." Now, from my understanding, covering copyrighted material always goes back to the "mechanical rate", where the original artist gets around 10 cents per song per unit sold. It never registered in my mind that there's a whole different process for TV/film use until now. So I did some more research, and it looks like a "sync license" is involved here, where you need to contact the publishers of the material directly. Since this listing offers a 50/50 split, I'm assuming the company that ran the listing will take care of this part.
Now, wouldn't Jimi Hendrix and Guns N Roses fall under the category of "unaffordable or nearly impossible to license"?! Why would Taxi reference all these examples of big smash hits if they're not going to be able to license them? I guess I need help understanding the licensing process when it comes to covers in film/tv. But my other question is: should I completely abandon this Beach Boys cover I just started recording? Can you guys give me some examples of classic songs that are affordable and very possible to license?
Sorry for the incredibly long description.
- Charles Loren
You may have read the listing asking for contemporary covers of classics. Some examples they gave were Filter's "Happy Together" cover, Taken By Trees' "Sweet Child O' Mine" cover, Devlin and Ed Sheeran's "All Along the Watchtower" cover, etc. Basically they don't want a "sound-alike" cover, but a modern, interesting cover.
I was excited about this listing and jumped into my studio immediately. A couple days later I re-read the listing, and I noticed something I must've skimmed over... here is the part I need help understanding. The listing says "You’d be wise to avoid covers of songs that would be unaffordable or nearly impossible to license like; The Rolling Stones, U2, The Beatles, Neil Young, etc." Now, from my understanding, covering copyrighted material always goes back to the "mechanical rate", where the original artist gets around 10 cents per song per unit sold. It never registered in my mind that there's a whole different process for TV/film use until now. So I did some more research, and it looks like a "sync license" is involved here, where you need to contact the publishers of the material directly. Since this listing offers a 50/50 split, I'm assuming the company that ran the listing will take care of this part.
Now, wouldn't Jimi Hendrix and Guns N Roses fall under the category of "unaffordable or nearly impossible to license"?! Why would Taxi reference all these examples of big smash hits if they're not going to be able to license them? I guess I need help understanding the licensing process when it comes to covers in film/tv. But my other question is: should I completely abandon this Beach Boys cover I just started recording? Can you guys give me some examples of classic songs that are affordable and very possible to license?
Sorry for the incredibly long description.
- Charles Loren