wooHOO!!!...it's HEE-RE.

[ciskokidd]

Quote:hey ted,..well, you can do A LOT with only 4 tracks..! I just did get a track with total 3 tracks (2 guitars, bass) under contract.rock on!martinI believe Sgt. Pepper's was done on four tracks, if I'm not mistaken.Rock on Ted!

[tedsingingfox]

Quote:Quote:hey ted,..well, you can do A LOT with only 4 tracks..! I just did get a track with total 3 tracks (2 guitars, bass) under contract.rock on!martinI believe Sgt. Pepper's was done on four tracks, if I'm not mistaken.Rock on Ted!Cool. Good to know, Martin. If nothing else, it's a way to start building ideas BEFORE going into the studio...but I'm planning on making it work harder than that. And, Cisco, you are correct, sir. And you're not nearly as demanding as Aub, when he pointed that out on another thread. His quote?"Sgt. Pepper was recorded on a 4-track. I expect nothing less." TedOH, the pressure. The PRESSURE!!!!!

[milfus]

youll be fine, just take it one track at a time, youll be the beatles in no time tedwatch out for asian girls tho....

[djdeweese]

Hey Ted, congrats!! By the way, I was just reading a book on engineering the other day, and as Martin said, you can do a lot with four tracks. They were talking about why music from the mid to late 60's was so good, and said that the restriction of four-track recording made them think about the process differently, so that mixes were really built to sound good from the bottom up. Have fun!

[tedsingingfox]

Quote:Hey Ted, congrats!! By the way, I was just reading a book on engineering the other day, and as Martin said, you can do a lot with four tracks. They were talking about why music from the mid to late 60's was so good, and said that the restriction of four-track recording made them think about the process differently, so that mixes were really built to sound good from the bottom up. Have fun!I like the sound of that. Any chance you'd be willing to SHARE the title of that particular book? Hhmmmm?