Classical piece, Will this work for film/TV?

[runwaytraffic]

Hi There,I am new to taxi and I am keen to be apart of what you guys are doing here..I am more of a songwriter than a producer so any advice you guys have on production as well as the actual song is welcome.Let me know what you think piece and what emotion/s are portrayedThe name of the track is "Ballet for Jade" and your critique would greatly be appreciated. find the song here ->http://www.myspace.com/composersteveprophetShould start playing automaticallyThank you Runway Traffic

[steini]

Judging from your myspace picture it must be hot there in S- Africa in this period.1st: the sounds, the piano sound is not bad but the cello-sound is awful and you will be judged by that if you send in a song.2nd: I like the song, it did not grab me completely but I'm sure with a little more feel it could work well. Maybe cause I felt the piano lacked a bit of emotion I have a hard time feeling a certain type of emotion while listening.Overall a nice song and good start.

[runwaytraffic]

Thanks steiniits pretty hot here!the piano is a bit mechanical an the cello is completely synthesized what about the melody... should it be stronger or .....should i work with this piece or toss it?

[jamesrjones]

Hi RWT.I really like this piece. The melodies to me were very emotional. The cello synth needs to be brought up a bit in the mix when the piano is dominating, but I thought the cello solo was excellent. I think this would be a great piece for TV / Film. Makes me want to write lyrics for it.

[steini]

Tossing pieces is never good, always finish em, if you don't have better cello sounds I would find some other sound or move the cello melody to the piano. The song is good, and completely on the right track, just takes time to find what to use etc etc.The main thing here when dealing with synth. classical instruments is to fool the listener into thinking they are real and that includes the screeners here in taxi. When you listen to your song and you fee. yourself it's the real deal then your are one step closer. It will always be hard to fool the instrument players themselves.

[runwaytraffic]

OK greatlemme see what i can do to make it more realistic and get my message across strongeri really appreciate feedback, i have no criticism around me at the moment and i would really like to take my music to the next levelthanks

[andyriggle]

Hey Runaway, Great stuff! You should have no problem going to the next level. But you need to invest in a professional sound library and a computer that can handle it. http://www.soundsonline.com/EWQLSO-Gold ... htmlThat's the only way, other than recording live instruments, that you'll get convincing audio. Synths are great for theater pits, gigsand rock, but suck when it comes to scoring and mock-ups. On my music page you can hear a huge difference between the old stuff I did on my synth, and the newer songs I did with decent software. I can't even listen to the old stuff at the bottom of my page anymore. Yuck. http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_mu ... 498460Kind Regards and Best of Luck, Andy

[hummingbird]

I agree with the above comments. You have great ideas, the key with film/tv is to a) have good (authentic) sounds, and b) make them sound like they are played live. The piano is good, and I like the melody & rythm of the piece. You might try working this as a piano piece only for now, until you get a better library of sounds.cheersHummin'bird

[runwaytraffic]

you guys are so right,i have just heard the EWQLSO-Gold-Pro, and on this side of the world, that would set me back R 4 533.00 and the of course i would have to get the Symphonic Choirs.... at R 4 084.00Guess i am just the wrong side of the planet, i think i am going to collaborate with someone who has got those toys! thanks guys

[geo]

Beautiful..... love stuff like this, Geo