Yea, tape saturation IS audible, in a good way, unless you get into distortion. Analog tape was ALWAYS recorded way into the red by the best engineers. (Analog and digital are completely different, as I'm sure you know). That's why my best analog recordings, peaking at +3 to +5, were and still are pretty much the best sounding, depending on the quality of the machine and the tape you use. That's how you get almost a zero noise floor, even without noise reduction circuitry.mojobone wrote:And Ern, if you're saturating the tape, that's pretty much audible, if you know what to listen for.
Someone asked Roy Thomas Baker how he got such a punchy and clean drum sound on Queen and Cars recordings. He said "Saturate the tape almost to the point of distortion, maybe as high as +6 db."
That said, "Rhythmeen" is probably the best loud rock recording I've ever heard.
Question for Billy Gibbons:
"The whole 'Rhythmeen' album has a very fat analog sound, almost like it was recorded on tape, using a lot of saturation. Was it recorded analog?"
Billy: "Indeed. There's a peculiar world that lives, quite possibly in both domains, analog and digital, and it's that wonderfully warm super saturated distorto something and I guess the message is, it doesn't matter how you get there, if you do get there, grab a hold of it and ride it."
Ern

