MMM.........are you also frustrated at how nyquists theorem is virtually always incorrectly quoted and practically never understood by end users in real world applications......gtrmann wrote:
Don't get me started on sampling rates........

![]() ![]() ![]() |
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
MMM.........are you also frustrated at how nyquists theorem is virtually always incorrectly quoted and practically never understood by end users in real world applications......gtrmann wrote:
Don't get me started on sampling rates........
I'm not an audio engineer, an electrical one by edumucationjdhogg wrote:MMM.........are you also frustrated at how nyquists theorem is virtually always incorrectly quoted and practically never understood by end users in real world applications......gtrmann wrote:
Don't get me started on sampling rates........
Agreed. This discussion got a little bit too theoretical for me!Casey H wrote:
Anyway, sometimes we all get too theoretical and technical![]()
and need to balance that with what our ears tell us.
![]()
Casey
Hey!mazz wrote:It's all about the music in the end, for sure. Ultimately if we make good sounding recordings, the end users will want to use it and will do with it what they need to to make it fit in their productions (usually turning it down until it's barely audible, but that's another topic!![]()
)
Yes!mazz wrote:Which is why checking mixes at very soft levels is crucial!! If your mix falls apart at low levels, it won't get used!
Seriously!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests