Old Standards_Distressor

Tell Your Friends about Gear that you love

Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff

jonathansorensen
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:05 am
Gender: Male
Location: Santa Monica
Contact:

Old Standards_Distressor

Post by jonathansorensen » Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:33 pm

It's spendy but if you buy one piece of outboard gear, get the Distressor. I've been working with it about a year now and it's ridiculous how musical it is. It's really hard to mess anything up. You can mix through it, you can track through it. I constantly run software drums through it and it makes a HUGE difference in warmth, punch and how natural they sound. I love tracking vocals through it. It's so warm and natural sounding.

If you want something to take off that digital harshness, here's the piece of gear.

Best,
jon

User avatar
mojobone
King of the World
King of the World
Posts: 11837
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 4:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Up in Indiana, where the tall corn grows
Contact:

Re: Old Standards_Distressor

Post by mojobone » Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:56 pm

An excellent point; if you can buy only one outboard/hardware compressor, Empirical Labs' Distressor should probably top the list, as it can emulate nearly all of the classics, barring extremes like the old Level-Loc and a few others that are probably more properly identified as limiters or leveling amps.
The Straight Stuff; Roots, Rock & Soul

http://twangfu.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/mojo_bone

User avatar
dschreiberjr
Getting Busy
Getting Busy
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:48 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Old Standards_Distressor

Post by dschreiberjr » Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:56 pm

Very cool. Thanks for the recommendation. I had tried a pair of these while I was at school (gotta love music school's gear budget), and thought they rocked. I used it on some sound design for film projects. Never on music. Great to hear it's so loved.

Do you work with a pair of them or just use one?

User avatar
mojobone
King of the World
King of the World
Posts: 11837
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 4:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Up in Indiana, where the tall corn grows
Contact:

Re: Old Standards_Distressor

Post by mojobone » Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:33 pm

I don't have any at home, but have used them at other peoples' studios; for druthers, get a pair, as they're great on drum overheads, among many, many other uses. You want the one with "British" mode: http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/ELI8XM/ , it's a worthy upgrade.


There are lotsa great tips and application notes in the manual
The Straight Stuff; Roots, Rock & Soul

http://twangfu.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/mojo_bone

jonathansorensen
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:05 am
Gender: Male
Location: Santa Monica
Contact:

Re: Old Standards_Distressor

Post by jonathansorensen » Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:23 am

dschreiberjr wrote:Very cool. Thanks for the recommendation. I had tried a pair of these while I was at school (gotta love music school's gear budget), and thought they rocked. I used it on some sound design for film projects. Never on music. Great to hear it's so loved.

Do you work with a pair of them or just use one?
I have only the one but I'm itching to get the second. It's great for mastering. I have the british mode. The unit is bizarre in that it's hard to make it sound bad.

Jon

User avatar
dschreiberjr
Getting Busy
Getting Busy
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:48 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Old Standards_Distressor

Post by dschreiberjr » Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:04 am

Nice. Thanks for the replies, guys.

Jon, do you find it limiting to have just the one? I'm curious if it is difficult to get a proper stereo signal out of just one. Say you have some drum overheads, I was thinking you could send the left channel through it and bring it back into the DAW, and then send the right channel through it and back into the DAW and just hard pan them and get a stereo signal out of it.

I see that method being a pain in the a$$, but curious if it sounds good (especially compared to having the pair)

Dave

User avatar
mojobone
King of the World
King of the World
Posts: 11837
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 4:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Up in Indiana, where the tall corn grows
Contact:

Re: Old Standards_Distressor

Post by mojobone » Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:53 am

According to the manual, (see my prior post, upthread) dual mono is preferred to link mode for certain applications.
The Straight Stuff; Roots, Rock & Soul

http://twangfu.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/mojo_bone

User avatar
dschreiberjr
Getting Busy
Getting Busy
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:48 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Old Standards_Distressor

Post by dschreiberjr » Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:05 pm

Thx mojo. I had a look at the manual, but I didn't really absorb that part. It sounds like, a stereo pair is preferred most of the time and in other situations, a dual mono approach is preferred.

User avatar
gtrmann
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 357
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:28 am
Gender: Male
Location: Brandon, FL. USA
Contact:

Re: Old Standards_Distressor

Post by gtrmann » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:32 am

I am not familiar with the distressor, how does it compare to the DBX 160X, or the Valley Dyna-mite. I use a Dyna-mite on Kick and Snare, and use a pair of 160Xs for parallel compression. I also use a 160X also on bass guitar.
Bruce Wendel
Song Wronger

Resistance isn't futile, it's voltage divided by current

Taxi
Soundcloud
Amp Repair | Sound System
Cover band

jonathansorensen
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:05 am
Gender: Male
Location: Santa Monica
Contact:

Re: Old Standards_Distressor

Post by jonathansorensen » Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:24 pm

dschreiberjr wrote:Nice. Thanks for the replies, guys.

Jon, do you find it limiting to have just the one? I'm curious if it is difficult to get a proper stereo signal out of just one. Say you have some drum overheads, I was thinking you could send the left channel through it and bring it back into the DAW, and then send the right channel through it and back into the DAW and just hard pan them and get a stereo signal out of it.

I see that method being a pain in the a$$, but curious if it sounds good (especially compared to having the pair)

Dave
I've actually experimented with that on stereo mixes. I isolate the left channel, run it through an EQ and the distressor and back in. Then switch up cords and run the right through the same process. It did a great job on a couple of mixes but on a couple, it seems like it messed up the stereo image. I'm not sure how or why or if mixed up somewhere else. Anyway, I'd REALLY just like to get a second though that may not be in the cards for along while. . .

Jon

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests