Mastering for submissions

with industry Pro, Nick Batzdorf

Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff

User avatar
Russell Landwehr
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Midwestern Ohio
Contact:

Re: Mastering for submissions

Post by Russell Landwehr » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:22 am

Also, to make sure you are providing the best quality MP3 you can, do some research on the encoding process and find an encoder that will work at high quality.

I use Steinberg Wavelab. It has a setting where the encoding process can be done quickly at low quality or slower at a higher quality... (the bit rate is the same for both, the software just makes sure to encode at a higher quality)
Multi-Genre Composer and Producer of TV and Film music Providing Easy to Use Cues for Every Scene

http://www.sensawehr.com
https://www.taximusic.com/hosting/home. ... l_Landwehr
http://soundcloud.com/russell-landwehr

Len911
Total Pro
Total Pro
Posts: 5351
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:13 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Peculiar, MO
Contact:

Re: Mastering for submissions

Post by Len911 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 1:44 pm

What Russell says makes sense. The Taxi player would be for "streaming" over the internet, and I'm pretty sure the screeners aren't going to listen over the internet, but to the actual mp3 file you send through a media player such as i-tunes, or quicktime player or Windows media player. I think they would also forward the actual mp3 file and not an internet link to your song.

A 16-bit wav file has more resolution than any mp3! Usually you would dither a 24bit or 32bit wav or aiff down to a 16bit and then render to an mp3. The sample rates would also need to be either 44.1Khz
or 48Khz.

For $55.41, there's a Sonnox Codec Toolbox, with a few features you may find useful.

"The NMR indicator (Noise-to-Mask Ratio) indicates possible audible differences between input and the codec output, so you can adjust the bit-rate for your mix. The Overs indicator shows if the process of encoding will introduce any clipping, giving you the chance to reduce the overall mix level slightly. The invaluable 'Clip Safe' feature will ensure clean encoded files, as the software auto-compensates for any overs during the encode process. Metadata, such as artist, track name and artwork, can easily be added to your files to be displayed on your mp3 player or iTunes."

http://www.sonnoxplugins.com/pub/plugin ... olbox.html
https://soundcloud.com/huck-sawyer-finn
Not an expert on contemporary music

User avatar
mojobone
King of the World
King of the World
Posts: 11837
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 4:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Up in Indiana, where the tall corn grows
Contact:

Re: Mastering for submissions

Post by mojobone » Mon Nov 16, 2015 5:16 pm

Len911 wrote: Usually you would dither a 24bit or 32bit wav or aiff down to a 16bit and then render to an mp3. The sample rates would also need to be either 44.1Khz
or 48Khz.


For maximum fidelity, you should be rendering your MP3s directly (with dither enabled) from your hi-res (24-bit or higher) masters. Not every software player is capable of this, but if you work with hi-res files this is the accepted 'best practice', according to every mastering engineer I've consulted. At this point, 16-bit 44.1kHz files are for CD reproduction only.
The Straight Stuff; Roots, Rock & Soul

http://twangfu.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/mojo_bone

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests