Profanity not recommended

[SusanAnnNorberg]

just curious. I submitted this stomp Clap rock song. In reading the submission it "recommends" no profanity. When I wrote this song I felt the word fit in the context of the song. Would something like this be forwardable? Or when they recommend no profanity do they really mean "No Profanity"
Just wondering if anyone else has experience with profanity. LOL


https://www.taxi.com/members/kvicyQmjSq ... fA-crumble

[crashgates]

Speaks for itself

[cosmicdolphin]

just curious. I submitted this stomp Clap rock song. In reading the submission it "recommends" no profanity. When I wrote this song I felt the word fit in the context of the song. Would something like this be forwardable? Or when they recommend no profanity do they really mean "No Profanity"
Just wondering if anyone else has experience with profanity. LOL

Your link doesn't work but generally, make a clean version too

[SusanAnnNorberg]

That's weird. I used the link under the song that they provide.hmm

[Casey H]

Just wondering if anyone else has experience with profanity. LOL

F*ck yea!

[Casey H]

Seriously, for a Taxi submission, you never want to give a reason for return when you can easily eliminate it. So take "not recommended" as "not allowed" to be sure. If you were submitting directly to a library, you could let them know you have a clean version as well and if they accept, send them both. When pitching a Taxi listing, you don't have that kind of leeway- a screener has to listen to what's in front of them and make the call.

Best,
Casey

[SusanAnnNorberg]

I guess I'll need to find out what it's going to cost me to eliminate the "SH" grr.....Now I've got to figure out why I can't get that link to work. It's right under the song

[SusanAnnNorberg]

https://www.taxi.com/members/kvicyQmjSq ... fA-crumble

[johnnyrowing]

Is your track set to "public"?

[SusanAnnNorberg]

Yes it is. Try this.

https://youtu.be/KRZg5HmudjI