thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Liked your review? Rave about it! Hated it, let us know!

Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff

Post Reply
User avatar
ballereau
Active
Active
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:43 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by ballereau » Wed Mar 05, 2025 3:55 pm

Hi,
Any thoughts on this


What I like most about this song
The style, instrumentation and mood are a good start for our listing. Thank you for your work.
I think you could improve this song by
Percussion needs compression and I think we can try to learn a bit more about mixing to properly mix this.
Additional things I noticed...
I returned or forwarded this song because
Mix sounds too raw and saturate

https://www.taxi.com/members/8khlvMr3S8 ... BZ9g-chill

User avatar
funsongs
Total Pro
Total Pro
Posts: 7484
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: So Cal
Contact:

Re: thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by funsongs » Wed Mar 05, 2025 6:35 pm

ballereau wrote:
Wed Mar 05, 2025 3:55 pm
Hi,
Any thoughts on this
https://www.taxi.com/members/8khlvMr3S8 ... BZ9g-chill
Hello Larry.
Personally, I'm liking all the 'sparkle' in this track. It reminds me of the 'era' that I listened to a lot of Jazz-Fusion bands,
radio/CD/live concerts/local clubs: The Rippingtons, David Benoit, Koinonia, Justo Almario - and too many more to name.
The spread of the mix sounds nice on my JBL 305 studio monitors.

I can sorta understand (if) the screener thought it was 'too bright'.
Probably could roll off some of the high EQ, punch up the bass...
but not for my ears: I'm diggin' it just like it is.

Hope that helps.
Peter
Peter Rahill - aka "funsongs"
NOW, back on YouTube (2022)
https://www.youtube.com/@FunsongsMusicByPeterRahill
https://soundcloud.com/funsongs-1
https://peterrahill.bandcamp.com/

“The future aint what it use to be.” - Yogi Berra

User avatar
ballereau
Active
Active
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:43 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by ballereau » Wed Mar 05, 2025 7:07 pm

thanks for the feedback!
You never know what these guys are really looking for.

User avatar
Casey H
King of the World
King of the World
Posts: 14652
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by Casey H » Wed Mar 05, 2025 7:12 pm

Cool track. I'm not the right guy for mix feedback and I'm on shitty speakers right now. It did sound a bit bright and maybe not opened up enough across frequencies including bass (grain of salt!). Others here are good at mix feedback. The good news is if all it needs is a re-mix, you have something solid for other opportunities.

You didn't post the listing text but if it was" NON-EXCLUSIVE Company that curates and provides in-store music to a long list of major Retail Brands all over the globe", I've noticed these are very high bar. Lots of very good tracks get rejected all the time.

Good luck!
:-) Casey

User avatar
ballereau
Active
Active
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:43 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by ballereau » Thu Mar 06, 2025 6:54 am

Thanks Casey for the feedback

User avatar
RealPickle
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:12 am
Gender: Male
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

Re: thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by RealPickle » Thu Mar 06, 2025 7:17 am

Agree with others, that's a cool track!

I'm certainly not a mix expert, but if I had to translate the feedback you got (and I'm 99% sure I know who the screener was based on what they wrote), I'd say the mix needs a bit more "glue". If this was for an in-store playlist, you really want everything to just kind of meld together like a soup so nothing stands out too much. Sometimes the sax is very prominent, then all of a sudden the guitar is really prominent, etc. I don't have good solutions but that's my best guess as to what they meant.

Also, regarding saturation, if you just lowered the overall level a bit that would solve that, and it also might help with the previous issue as well. (Although I don't personally feel it's too saturated)

These are just my 2 cents. Again, it's a good track!
--Geoff, aka Real Pickle
realpickleproductions.com

User avatar
ballereau
Active
Active
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:43 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by ballereau » Thu Mar 06, 2025 2:02 pm

thanks for the input

Larry

User avatar
WSAO
Impressive
Impressive
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2023 6:31 am
Gender: Male
Location: Sydney - Australia
Contact:

Re: thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by WSAO » Tue Mar 11, 2025 6:16 pm

Very cool song!
Just a few tweaks to the drums and percussion, and it’ll be perfect.
The bass, sax, and guitars sound fantastic—great work!

Well done!

User avatar
funsongs
Total Pro
Total Pro
Posts: 7484
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: So Cal
Contact:

Re: thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by funsongs » Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:02 pm

ballereau wrote:
Wed Mar 05, 2025 3:55 pm
Hi,
Any thoughts on this?
https://www.taxi.com/members/8khlvMr3S8 ... BZ9g-chill
If this track was on Soundcloud, I'd REPOST it to my own page and add it to a playlist.
I really like it that much.
Cheers,
Peter
Peter Rahill - aka "funsongs"
NOW, back on YouTube (2022)
https://www.youtube.com/@FunsongsMusicByPeterRahill
https://soundcloud.com/funsongs-1
https://peterrahill.bandcamp.com/

“The future aint what it use to be.” - Yogi Berra

User avatar
ballereau
Active
Active
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:43 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: thoughts onSmooth /easy listening

Post by ballereau » Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:36 pm

Thanks for the feedback
Best Larry

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests