Publishing Deal ????????

A cozy place to hang out and discuss all things music.

Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff

lucky
Active
Active
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:08 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by lucky » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:32 am

As a struggling Singing/Songwriter how much negotiating power do I have? Isn't it a take it or leave it situation in most of our cases?I want to go into this eye's wide open but still cut a good deal.Thank you,Lucky

User avatar
Casey H
King of the World
King of the World
Posts: 14683
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by Casey H » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:51 am

LuckyYou don't have a lot of negotiating power (you probably have SOME) BUT you really might not need much at all. If it is a good and reputable publishing company and the contract if fairly consistent with industry practices (according to your music attorney), there may not be anything to ask for.You mentioned that this publisher has a good track record. Do you have specific examples and are the referenced examples fairly current? ...i.e. within the last 2-5 years, not from the 60's and 70's... I'm sure these are things you would discuss with your music attorney.The reason I asked about the track record is it can relate to what you are comfortable with as far as the reversion clause time period. Five years with a company that has a strong track record can very much be worth it. Smaller publishers often ask for three years. Most of the majors ask for at least five. No reason to get hung up on negotiating power until you've had a discussion with your music attorney. Try to work with a music attorney (if you can) that understands the "little guy" and that you are not looking for a lot of negotiation points, just the major ones that put you at serious risk. Some attorneys want to bloody the contract to death and kill the deal.Once again, good luck and congrats! Casey

User avatar
ragani
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1246
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:02 am
Gender: Female
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by ragani » Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:35 am

Quote:Reversion clause can run anywhere from 6 months (if you have the clout to pull it off) to up to 2 years. I would try to keep it under 1 year.That might be good for a song that you are trying to pitch to an artist, but from what I learned at the last TAXI Rally, up to 5 years might be a better expectation for exclusive music library placement reversion clauses, as it takes a long time to get the songs into their library and out to users, and then to wait for placements, if no immediate use is in order. Raags
"Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it..." - Goethe
http://www.RaganiWorld.com - Turn the World to Love®
http://www.taximusic.com/hosting/home.php?artist=ragani

matto
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 3320
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 5:02 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by matto » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:16 am

Quote:Lucky, Reversion clause can run anywhere from 6 months (if you have the clout to pull it off) to up to 2 years. I would try to keep it under 1 year.I agree with Raags, for film and TV, a reversion clause of 6 months would be tantamount to not signing a deal at all. This business moves rather slowly, so demanding a very short reversion clause is counterproductive and NOT beneficial to the writer.2 years is a good length which actually gives the company a chance to exploit the song(s). If you believe in the company, longer than that would be okay as well.Like Casey said, the main thing is to do your best to vet the company. What placements he has gotten recently with music like yours would be more pertinent to your situation than the fact that he's been around for a long time and enjoys success with 50's and 60's songs. For all you know that might be his market niche and what film/tv people come to him for.It's true that you don't have a lot of clout to demand sweeping contract changes at this point, however you do have the right to ask lots of (polite) questions, ask for recent credits etc...and you have the freedom to only give him a few songs for now, which I think would be a good idea. matto

tedsingingfox
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 3168
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:52 am
Gender: Male
Location: Nashville
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by tedsingingfox » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:40 am

FWIW, the deal I signed last month (my first...wooHOO!) is for 4-yrs. before the reversion clause takes effect.
The truest of tears
Seem to me to be the ones
Shed in gratitude
-Haiku by TF, 1982

ajenkz
Getting Busy
Getting Busy
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by ajenkz » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:54 am

So, if you sign a publishing deal like this, are you no longer to use the song or do you still retain the rights to sell it on iTunes and host it on sites like Myspace and your own personal website? What about submissions to TAXI; I assume once a songs been signed to a publisher, you can no longer submit it to other listings until the agreement is up?

User avatar
guscave
Committed Musician
Committed Musician
Posts: 836
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 3:48 am
Gender: Male
Location: miami, florida
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by guscave » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:16 am

Quote:So, if you sign a publishing deal like this, are you no longer to use the song or do you still retain the rights to sell it on iTunes and host it on sites like Myspace and your own personal website? What about submissions to TAXI; I assume once a songs been signed to a publisher, you can no longer submit it to other listings until the agreement is up?Non-exclusive deals allow you to continue to use the song for whatever you want. I'm assuming that Lucky's deal is exclusive, otherwise why ask for a reversion clause.

ajenkz
Getting Busy
Getting Busy
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by ajenkz » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:36 pm

Alright makes sense then thanks

lucky
Active
Active
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:08 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by lucky » Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:48 pm

OK, What's the difference between Exclusive & Non-Exclusive agreement's?I told you this is all new to me! Will take your advice re; Attorney.Thank you,Lucky

User avatar
ragani
Serious Musician
Serious Musician
Posts: 1246
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:02 am
Gender: Female
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Contact:

Re: Publishing Deal ????????

Post by ragani » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:38 am

Hi Lucky,Think of it like relationships-- exclusive means you won't be seeing other people (and your song won't be offered to other companies, publications, etc. when it has an exclusive contract with one company). If it's a non-exclusive relationship, why then you can go ahead and see others (submit that song to other companies and opportunities).Best of luck,Raags
"Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it..." - Goethe
http://www.RaganiWorld.com - Turn the World to Love®
http://www.taximusic.com/hosting/home.php?artist=ragani

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests