

![]() ![]() ![]() |
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
Andy, Something I was thinking about the other day, this whole gb/s thing. I would think this would only be an issue for people streaming a TON of high samplerate/bitdepth tracks. I know we've all been trained to think in terms of higher RPMs and access rates and data speeds and all. I think it has a lot to do with what we learned with the old MFM and RLL and SCSI and ESDI stuff. I know way back when, you had to eek out all the performance you could from a system to even get 16 tracks of 44.1/16 to keep from glitching on a low-buffer setup. But I've successfully streamed upwards of thirty 44.1/16 tracks during live mixing using USB 2.0. I mean, I have yet to hear anyone say that they ran out of hard-drive transfer rate during tracking or playback. Does anyone ever really peak that HD meter anymore? And I really don't understand why it's so critical to keep everything separate from the system drive. Doesn't everyone set the swap file to Zero?andygabrys wrote: you might want to read up on the actual performance of mechanical vs SSD 6gb/s SATA III hard drives.
I see you have a 500 GB 6 gb/s mechanical drive spec'd out.
What I checked out recently stated that 3 gb/s on mechanical drives is fine, but that 6gb/s on a mechanical drive provides a fast connection, but that the performance of the physical drive head will restrict the drive from ever really transferring data at that 6 gb/s rate.
Contrast vs. an SSD at 6gb/s - the interface is fast, and the drive performance is really fast so the drive can actually move data at a speed much closer to the interface speed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests