Does it mean that
1. this unique approach is a good thing that I should continue doing or
2. it's too unique and nobody's ever gonna wanna cut it? (I know I'm a little paranoid

![]() ![]() ![]() |
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
After this sentence they went on to tell me that the chorus should've been in a higher range....how the vocals should be more polished... so nothing else about being unique.hazineju wrote:hi Esther! I hate to be unhelpful but it sounds like it could mean either way. But I would guess they meant choice 1. If they felt it was "too unique and nobody's ever gonna wanna cut it" I think they would have gone on to say that in the critique, in a more tactful way, hopefully![]()
Do you have any more details of the critique to help us interpret it?
allends wrote:I can understand why you might be uneasy about being called "unique", but I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that the screener was likely admiring something interesting in your writing. I was told by an A&R person that he was always on the lookout for something that stood out from the crowd. So please take to heart whatever specific advice you were given and develop those strengths & more, because if you have the "uniquness" spark you have an edge in this business.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests