I think we're saying the same thing from different directions.
How about those guitar picks?


Mazz
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
I'm exactly the same as you brother.wta wrote:For years I was really "just" a vocalist and played part time rhythm guitar so my need for pro gear was nigh nil but over the years as I've expanded what I do so also my gear had to expand.
Yes, just like the audience (listeners).mazz wrote:In my experience, the people who I am trying to sell my music to don't care at all what gear I use as long as the music sounds great and works musically for what they need at the time.
Yes, this is also true. These points are NOT mutually exclusive. That's the paradox. The easiest example to see this with is singing: if you're gear is crap (you're voice) your vocal is crap.wta wrote:...what I'm saying in the last part here is about professionalism and the reality that you've got to have both great chops AND gear.
Keith, I understand your point! But ever since I got married back in Kalamazoo years ago, my wife INSISTED that I got my own studio outside of the house. No wonder! I had a Fender Dual Showman that wouldn't break up until I turned it up to "11" --- We lived on a lake in a house, and when I did a rhythm track on the Dual Showman, my old neighbor lady almost called the police.t4mh wrote:Sorry but my modeling is nothing even close to something out of a box, at least I don't think it is. That said, I agree about the interaction argument. I like to use my amp when I'm trying to do something that I can't get through modeling, like feedback, and I like to play my amp! But the room, let me say this, its great if you are able to have a room set up for guitar, period. But the idea doesn't really work for me here at the house because the interior design of a room along with the idea of the primary use of a room for guitar is not something my wife and I easily agree on! It becomes too much hassle to change a room on a daily basis and pointless when the degree of modeling I can achieve is so very high.
Keith
ernstinen wrote:Keith, I understand your point! But ever since I got married back in Kalamazoo years ago, my wife INSISTED that I got my own studio outside of the house. No wonder! I had a Fender Dual Showman that wouldn't break up until I turned it up to "11" --- We lived on a lake in a house, and when I did a rhythm track on the Dual Showman, my old neighbor lady almost called the police.t4mh wrote:Sorry but my modeling is nothing even close to something out of a box, at least I don't think it is. That said, I agree about the interaction argument. I like to use my amp when I'm trying to do something that I can't get through modeling, like feedback, and I like to play my amp! But the room, let me say this, its great if you are able to have a room set up for guitar, period. But the idea doesn't really work for me here at the house because the interior design of a room along with the idea of the primary use of a room for guitar is not something my wife and I easily agree on! It becomes too much hassle to change a room on a daily basis and pointless when the degree of modeling I can achieve is so very high.
Keith
I don't deny the great sounds of digital sound sources for guitar. But, I believe there STILL is no way of emulating a tube preamp, a tube power amp, speakers and cabinets of your choice, the room you choose to build (or not build), and the microphones you use to capture the sound of the amp cabinet, first, and the room, secondly. --- That is exactly why I have built about 4 soundproof booths since I moved to Los Angeles, because I REVERE the recording process of amp and microphone. It's an art, which took me 15 years to learn. Anyone can negate my process, but it works for me, and I have signed many guitar masters to music libraries BECAUSE of the sound I get from from my method. I couldn't get this sound through a Silvertone guitar, a Crate amp, and a Radio Shack Microphone.
Ern![]()
Well, I USED to record a Marshall in stereo with a Rockman. Pretty cool sound! The Marshall was on "11" in the booth, and the Rockman (solid state) was fully cranked on the 2nd channel. I had a Boss flanger on the Marshall, and if you walked into the booth it was so noisy you couldn't believe it! But with a 57 on the cab, it was sweet! I either had an A/B box between the two, or a Boss Stereo Chorus. For a loud rock song, you'd never hear the noise from the Marshall.cardell wrote:But have you also noticed how engineers/producers eventually end up trying to make the sounds of the real and fake meet in the middle (I mean sound the same).
C'mon over! We've got a second bedroom, about 15 miles away from my studio!BTW, I'd love to record in your studio one day.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests