Vienna Vs Los Angeles strings

[remmet]

MIke, I echo what Mazz said about depth of field. Everything sounds up front and at the same volume level. It would be helpful to make more of a sonic distinction between the primary melodic elements and the various layers of supporting accompaniment. This would help not only with the clarity of the orchestration, but also with the clarity of the composition.

Another point I would make is that repetition can easily become repetitious if it repeats, especially without variation, for too long. For example, the opening piano line just goes on and on and on. The notes and velocities never change, and the orchestral accompaniment doesn't change, either by varying the dynamics (crescendos/diminuendos, etc.) or by bringing in other elements to developing a sense of building momentum. The lack of dynamic and orchestration variation is usually a dead giveaway that you're hearing a sample library. Regarding dynamics, you've got 127 velocity choices for every note (as well as other CC controller options), so a LOT more can be done - just with volume and velocity levels - to enhance the realism of sample-based orchestral music.

Once you have each instrumental part working as realistically as possible, you can then address the macro details of the mix, i.e., overall balance levels, spacial issues, processing, etc.

I think dealing with these issues will get you to that next level of professionalism. And it sounds like you already have the tools - both software-wise and talent-wise - to do it. Good luck!

Richard

[mikeymike2000]

Thanks TechNoiz! I just figured out how to do that velocity thing with mod wheel and it is totally cool.
(Could not find your profile though)

Richard: These are also a good points!

Thank you both for your time and insights.