I don't need the quotation marks Steve!2lane wrote:Guess there's hope for us "old" guys![]()
Steve

![]() ![]() ![]() |
Moderators: admin, mdc, TAXIstaff
I don't need the quotation marks Steve!2lane wrote:Guess there's hope for us "old" guys![]()
Steve
davekershaw wrote:I don't need the quotation marks Steve!2lane wrote:Guess there's hope for us "old" guys![]()
Steve
I think at this point, even Dave could make better guesses than these guys areCasey H wrote:Yea, I think the word "credible" has lost some credibility as of late.![]()
It takes all kinds Jon....unfortunately!elser wrote:I recently became FB friends with a girl who lives in Tibet. She is certain that Obama is personally responsible and that it's an act of genocide. That kind of thinking drives me crazy. There is no conspiracy. The only thing mysterious is that we can't find it. And that's not that mysterious. It went down in the general vicinity of some of the deepest parts of the ocean, It's very likely we'll never find it, but when people make irresponsible conclusions like it was an act of genocide.....URRR!. There are thousands of international flights everyday from much more hostile countries, why pick just that one?
I'm OK with legal action.....once we know (if ever) that the airline was negligent.davekershaw wrote:Just when you think they're about to find it, they move the search area 680 miles north, after another "credible" lead.
I see the lawyers are already pestering the families to sue!
Must be bad enough for them already!!
A drone is more likely than some of the other theories Len.Len911 wrote:Of all the strange speculations, it's strange that no one has brought up my theory, at least I haven't heard it yet, I've heard everything else, even psychics for cryin' out loud. Surely i haven't had an original thought,lol!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests