JohnAtonic wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 11:16 am
Ok, but how are they ever gonna know that you up sampled?
Because you just told us all on a public forum
![Wink ;)](https://forums.taxi.com/images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
. Seriously, do whatever you think is right for you, your workflow and your customers.
Personally, I try to respect my customers' requests by giving then what they ask for, rather than doing whatever I can get away with. Sometimes that has to be balanced with what makes most sense for me, but using 10% more disk space seems a small price to pay when external hard drives are relative inexpensive, flipping a DAW switch takes no effort, and avoiding re-work is an efficiency win.
And if further up-sampling as part of the render process can gives a further quality gain (as Mark claims) then why not try it? You might get the same thrill as Bradley as an unexpected bonus (did I spell that correctly?
![Laughing :lol:](https://forums.taxi.com/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
).
Graham (UK). Still composing a little faster than decomposing, and 100% HI.